Gentlemen, here is the NEW TOP PERFORMING SITE. When we last reviewed GIO, it was brand new. Since then, it’s gotten some scale and we’ve been very satisfied with the results. We’ve INCREASED our lay ratio by quite a bit, basically propelling it to be our top recommended site.

Here are the NEW STATS as of today  –  you’ll see that they are pretty impressive :

GetItOn.com UPDATED Statistics

===PREVIOUS REVIEW from OCTOBER 2, 2009==

GetItOn.com is a newly launched site, and our overall experience with it was very satisfying. Good girl ratio and good communication features helped us pull a few hotties from this site. It’s important to note that while talking to women on this site, we used a softer approach since the women using this service are geared a little more towards sexual compatibility rather than plain vulgarity. Overall, we found that women on the site were fairy responsive and open to a few freaky ideas. We found the price to be worth the expense.

Below are the statistics we gathered during our 1.5 month long GetItOn.com experiment.:

GetItOn.com Statistics (from October 2, 2009)

Still doing very well in our rankings, AFF continues to provide quality girls. We met some more girls on the site, and had a few more successes on it. If you’re not comfortable going webcam, this is a good site, with a wide range of girls of all ages and walks  of life.

The site increased in our esteem mainly because one of our reviewers spent a lot of time on it. He had a smile on his face almost every day.

Here are the NEW STATS as of today – you’ll see that they are pretty impressive:

AdultFriendFinder.com UPDATED Statistics

===PREVIOUS REVIEW  from OCTOBER 2, 2009==

AdultFriendFinder.com is a great fling site. The site is easy to navigate and the search options are very straight forward to use. While the ratio of AdultFriendFinder.com isn’t as good as SexSearch.com the quality of the women we met was above-par.

We messaged a fair amount of women between 2:00 AM and 4:00 AM and got a few replies. That’s impressive. It means they have real women as customers. So we did what we do best and chatted. All in all, we recommend this site to anyone willing to put in a little time flirting.

Below are the statistics we gathered during our 3 month long AdultFriendFinder.com experiment.:

AdultFriendFinder.com Statistics (from October 2, 2009)

Another new entrant we’ve spent time reviewing this last 1.5 months. Match.com is pretty much your typical dating site. It’s used by A LOT of people, so you’re pretty sure to find someone in your area. Like most regular dating sites, the majority of women on this site claim wanting a steady relationship, but we found that they generally don’t have any issues having some fun while they’re looking, as long as you’re clear with them .

Again, our reviewers did well on this site – mainly because of the wealth of women that are available in their local cities.

As far as the site goes, Match is one of the better performing sites – so they pump a lot of cash back into making sure their users have a good experience. The interface is awesome and the site easy to use.

Here are the stats for this fresh-off-the-press site.:

Match.com.com NEW Statistics

Yet another new entrant we’ve spent time reviewing this last month. FastCupid.com was proposed to us by one of our reviewers. Not much to say about this site apart from the standard: clean interface, honest billing practices, good ratio of women to men .

The stats speak for themselves.  Here they are for FastCupid.com.:

FastCupid.com.com NEW Statistics

This one surprised us. We haven’t spent a lot of extra time on AshleyMadison.com in the last month. In fact, we only sent 10 additional emails since our last review. What was surprising is that we got responses from women we contacted back in September, who were finally ready to escape their husbands and come shack up.

We DOUBLED our hookup count . That’s pretty good, as far as we’re concerned .

It seems that while some respond quickly, a large portion of women take their sweet time to respond.

Here are the updated Stats for AshleyMadison.com:

AshleyMadison.com UPDATED Statistics

AshleyMadison.com caters to the married-but-single. What’s that, you ask? For us, it’s married wives that aren’t getting it at home. The one thing I can say (if you have no morals like us) is: why not? We decided to try AshleyMadison.com because we figured that it should be pretty easy to hook up with married women that are already prowling for an affair. While there are much fewer women than guys on the site, I do need to stress that looks absolutely matter for married women looking for a one night fantasy.

Also Be aware: some may be sub-par but they compensate with absolute willingness to please. Not for everyone but we had fun.

Below are the statistics we gathered during our 3 month long AshleyMadison.com experiment.:

AshleyMadison.com Statistics (from October 2, 2009)

After having phenomenal initial success with SS, we’re reduced to having less success in this last month. Why? We have NO IDEA. We didn’t change our tactics all that much .

Don’t get us wrong – the site’s still great to use, but no longer deserves the amazing praise it previously held. Simply the fact that we had more or less an equal amount of hook-ups from FastCupid.com in half the use time is enough for us to bump this one down.

Here are the NEW STATS as of today – not much change, except for the effort level:

SexSearch.com UPDATED Statistics

===PREVIOUS REVIEW from OCTOBER 2, 2009==

SexSearch.com is by far the best site we could find out there for hooking up. It’s great for a few reasons. The first is that the ratio of women to men is very good. You still have to do a little bit of hunting, and there are always the mandatory girls that never respond. The second is that this booty call site has great communication features including webcam chat. This really helps you get to know the person you’re talking to, and actually reduces your time-to-score. We saw that through this site, we went from Meet-to-Mack in less then 4 hours, with little effort. In general, we found the girls on this site to be younger and prettier, probably because it ranks well with graduate students and younger professionals.

Below are the statistics we gathered during our 3 month long SexSearch.com experiment.:

AshleyMadison.com UPDATED Statistics

Not much progress on this site. It’s still ‘OK’ (simply because of our initial experience with it), but it’s in danger of losing its spot in our Top Sites. There’s been a lot more effort put into it, but overall, we’re disappointed of the results .

As you can see from the stats below, we sent quite a bit of emails out, but haven’t really increased our hookups. A little disappointing.

Here are the updated stats:

HornyMatches.com UPDATED Statistics

===PREVIOUS REVIEW from OCTOBER 2, 2009==

HornyMatches.com is worth checking out of you’re willing to take some time to do the work required to meet women. While the site interface is questionable and a little bit of a pain to use, the women we met were essentially ready to go after a few beers. Replies did not come as easy and re-replies did not come as often – but once we found a few serious prospects, they were willing and able to do things that even we didn’t expect. We found one girl the worked for a circus that was willing to twist into a pretzel for us. She gets an 8 for pure effort.

Below are the statistics we gathered during our 2 month long HornyMatches.com experiment:

HornyMatches.com Statistics (from October 2, 2009)

Statistical Comparision - Top 5 Sites